Season 26/27Exclusive AccessSign inOpen the boardSeason 26/27Exclusive AccessSign inOpen the boardEvery match of the day by hour, which of them we called, and how those calls finished. Open an hour for its fixtures.
English Premier League · 3 Jan 2026 · Every shot from Wolverhampton Wanderers 3-0 West Ham United, placed on the pitch and sized by expected goals (xG). Wolverhampton Wanderers generated the better chances, 1.87 xG to West Ham United's 0.32. The running xG race and post-shot quality (xGOT) are below.
Wolverhampton Wanderers attack right, West Ham United attack left. Wolverhampton Wanderers took 3 from 1.87 xG, West Ham United managed 0.32 xG for 0.
Cumulative expected goals. White markers are goals. Wolverhampton Wanderers 1.87 xG, West Ham United 0.32 xG.
This page is the shot map of a game that has finished. On InPlayWise you get the same depth on the fixtures still to come, and live while they play:
See the full track record - every day published, including the weak ones. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. 18+.
Expected goals scores every shot by the chance it had of being a goal, from 0 to 1, based on where and how it was taken. Add a team's shots up and you get the goals an average team would expect from those chances, often a fairer read of a match than the final score. InPlayWise tracks xG live for every game.
Post-shot expected goals (xGOT) scores only shots on target, by how hard they were to save once struck. It separates the quality of the chance from the quality of the finish and the save.
Wolverhampton Wanderers had 11 shots (8 on target) for 1.87 xG. West Ham United had 6 shots (0 on target) for 0.32 xG.
InPlayWise carries live win probability, in-play expected goals, our model's single call and every market for the fixtures still to come, with a public settled track record. 18+.
